The Lexical Semantics of Comparative Expressions in a Multi-Level Semantic Processor
نویسنده
چکیده
Comparative expressions (CEs) such as "bigger than" and "more oranges than" are highly ambiguous, and their meaning is context dependent. Thus, they pose problems for the semantic interpretation algorithms typically used in natural language database interfaces. We focus on the comparison attribute ambiguities that occur with CEs. To resolve these ambiguities our natural language interface interacts with the user, finding out which of the possible interpretations was intended. Our multi-level semantic processor facilitates this interaction by recognizing the occurrence of comparison attribute ambiguity and then calculating and presenting a list of candidate comparison attributes from which the user may choc6e. I I PROBLEM DESCRIPTION. Although there has been considerable work on the development of natural language database interfaces, many difficult language interpretation problems remain. One of these is the semantic interpretation of comparative expressions such as those shown in sentences (1) through (3). (1) Does ACME construct b e t t e r buildings than ACE? (2) Does ACME construct buildings faster than ACE? (3) Are more oranges than apples exported by Mexico? To interpret a comparative expression (CE) a 'natural language processor must determine (1) the entities to he compared, and (2) the attribute(s) of those entities to consider in performing the comparison. The selection of comparison attributes is made difficult by the high level of lexical ambiguity exhibited by comparative predicates. For example, what pieces of data should be compared to answer query (1)? If the database contains information about foundation type, structural characteristics, wiring, and insulation, any of these attributes could be used. Similarly, when comparing orange and apple exports as in query (3), we might compare numeric quantity, weight, volume, or monetary value. To further complicate matters, the plausible comparison attributes for a comparative predicate change with the arguments to which that predicate is applied. Table 1 shows several examples of likely comparison attributes to use with the predicate "bigger" depending on the types of entity that are being compared. Since the system must determine for a comparative predicate the lexical definition intended by the user, this problem is, at heart, one of lexical ambiguity resolution. The problems discussed so far are similar to the well known vagueness and context sensitivity of adjectives (although they occur here even in sentences without adjectives such as (3)). Any proposed method of CE interpretation should also treat several other phenomena that are unique to comparatives. These are bipredicational comparisons, cross-class comparisons, and pairability constraints. Bipredlca t ional comparisons involve two predicates, as shown in example (4) (the
منابع مشابه
Lexical Semantics and Selection of TAM in Bantu Languages: A Case of Semantic Classification of Kiswahili Verbs
The existing literature on Bantu verbal semantics demonstrated that inherent semantic content of verbs pairs directly with the selection of tense, aspect and modality formatives in Bantu languages like Chasu, Lucazi, Lusamia, and Shiyeyi. Thus, the gist of this paper is the articulation of semantic classification of verbs in Kiswahili based on the selection of TAM types. This is because the sem...
متن کاملDynamic Categorization of Semantics of Fashion Language: A Memetic Approach
Categories are not invariant. This paper attempts to explore the dynamic nature of semantic category, in particular, that of fashion language, based on the cognitive theory of Dawkins’ memetics, a new theory of cultural evolution. Semantic attributes of linguistic memes decrease or proliferate in replication and spreading, which involves a dynamic development of semantic category. More specific...
متن کاملOn the Problem of Lexical Semantic Change
The article provides an insight into a problem of lexical semantic change. A short historical outline of the development of semantic studies is given. The authors analyze some of the most important stages in the history of the formation of this field. The existing approaches to dealing with form and meaning, namely semasiological and onomasiological ones are discussed. The authors consider the ...
متن کاملThe Semantics of the Word Istikbar (Arrogance) in the Holy Quran based on Syntagmatic Relations(A Case Study of Semantic Proximity and Semantic Contrast)
The word istikbar (arrogance) is one of the key words in the monotheistic system of the Quran, which has found a special status as a special feature of the opponents and adversaries of the call to the truth. Given the prominent role of this issue in the human life system and its provision of corruption and moral deviations, it is necessary to represent the nature of the elements that make up th...
متن کاملMeaningfulness of Religious Language in the Light of Conceptual Metaphorical Use of Image Schema: A Cognitive Semantic Approach
According to modern religious studies, religions are rooted in certain metaphorical representations, so they are metaphorical in nature. This article aims to show, first, how conceptual metaphors employ image schemas to make our language meaningful, and then to assert that image-schematic structure of religious expressions, by which religious metaphors conceptualize abstract meanings, is the ba...
متن کامل